AMD A4-9125 vs Intel Core i5-5350U
Сравнительный анализ процессоров AMD A4-9125 и Intel Core i5-5350U по всем известным характеристикам в категориях: Общая информация, Производительность, Память, Графика, Графические интерфейсы, Поддержка графических API, Совместимость, Периферийные устройства, Технологии, Виртуализация, Качество картинки в графике, Безопасность и надежность. Анализ производительности процессоров по бенчмаркам: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
Преимущества
Причины выбрать AMD A4-9125
- Кэш L2 в 2 раз(а) больше, значит больше данных можно в нём сохранить для быстрого доступа
Причины выбрать Intel Core i5-5350U
- Примерно на 12% больше тактовая частота: 2.90 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
- Примерно на 17% больше максимальная температура ядра: 105°C vs 90°C
- Более новый технологический процесс производства процессора позволяет его сделать более мощным, но с меньшим энергопотреблением: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Производительность в бенчмарке PassMark — Single thread mark примерно на 63% больше: 1688 vs 1038
- Производительность в бенчмарке PassMark — CPU mark в 2.2 раз(а) больше: 2733 vs 1221
| Характеристики | |
| Максимальная частота | 2.90 GHz vs 2.6 GHz |
| Максимальная температура ядра | 105°C vs 90°C |
| Технологический процесс | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Бенчмарки | |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1688 vs 1038 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 2733 vs 1221 |
Сравнение бенчмарков
CPU 1: AMD A4-9125
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-5350U
Amd a4 9125 windows 10
Specifications of the AMD A4-9125 processor dedicated to the laptop sector, it has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.6GHz. The table below makes it possible to observe well the lithography, the number of transistors (if present), the offered cache memory, the maximum capacity of RAM memory that we can get, the type of compatible memory, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in the Passmark platform, Cinebench R15 and Geekbench 4.
Specifications:
| Processor | AMD A4-9125 |
| Market | Laptop |
| Family | Stoney Ridge |
| Part number(s), S-Spec | AM9125AYN23AC |
| Release date | Q4 2018 |
| Lithography | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 1,200,000,000 |
| Cores | 2 |
| Threads | 2 |
| Base frequency | 2.3 GHz |
| Turbo frequency | 2.6 GHz |
| Cache memory | 1 MB |
| Max memory capacity | 12 GB |
| Memory types | DDR4-1866 |
| Max # of memory channels | 1 |
| Max memory bandwidth | 13.91 GB/s |
| Max PCIe lanes | 8 |
| TDP | 15 W |
| GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon R3 Graphics (Stoney) |
| GPU shading units | 128 |
| GPU base clock rate | 200 MHz |
| GPU max clock rate | 686 MHz |
| GPU FP32 floating point | 167.7 GFLOPS |
| Socket | BGA |
| Maximum temperature | 90°C |
| CPU-Z single thread | 142 |
| CPU-Z multi thread | 265 |
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 60 |
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 100 |
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 160 |
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 240 |
| PassMark single thread | 670 |
| PassMark CPU Mark | 940 |
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 1,560 |
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 2,393 |
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core | 308 |
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 518 |
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 28.83 GFLOPS |
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 160 pts / W |
| Amazon |  |
| eBay |  |
Performances :
Performance comparison between this processor and those of equivalent power, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.
Performance comparison on the CPU-Z benchmark software for IT processors:
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y#ad | 178 483 |
| Intel Celeron N4020#ad | 206 418 |
| AMD Ryzen 3 3200U#ad | 134 402 |
| Intel Celeron 3867U#ad | 194 389 |
| Intel Celeron 4205U#ad | 191 384 |
| AMD A4-9125#ad | 142 265 |
| AMD A4-9120e#ad | 108 211 |
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Performance comparison on the Cinebench R15 benchmark platform for IT devices:
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4120#ad | 82 195 |
| Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y#ad | 70 160 |
| Intel Celeron N4020#ad | 80 145 |
| Intel Celeron 4205U#ad | 73 138 |
| Intel Celeron 3867U#ad | 68 127 |
| AMD A4-9125#ad | 60 100 |
| AMD A4-9120e#ad | 24 46 |
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Performance comparison on the Cinebench R20 benchmark platform for computers:
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron 5205U#ad | 151 330 |
| Intel Celeron N4020#ad | 170 300 |
| Intel Celeron 3867U#ad | 145 296 |
| Intel Celeron 4205U#ad | 158 279 |
| Intel Core i5-L16G7#ad | 90 260 |
| AMD A4-9125#ad | 160 240 |
| Intel Pentium Gold 6405U#ad | 200 220 |
| AMD A4-9120e#ad | 66 110 |
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
Performance comparison on the Passmark benchmark platform for computing machines:
| PassMark — CPU Mark | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y#ad | 919 1,609 |
| Intel Celeron 3867U#ad | 1,082 1,457 |
| Intel Celeron 4205U#ad | 1,027 1,268 |
| Intel Celeron 5205U#ad | 934 1,266 |
| AMD A4-9125#ad | 670 940 |
| AMD A4-9120C#ad | 670 940 |
| AMD A4-9120e#ad | 736 856 |
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows: performance comparison in Geekbench 4 with Windows operating system.
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y#ad | 2,102 4,187 |
| Intel Celeron 5205U#ad | 2,357 3,982 |
| Intel Celeron 3867U#ad | 2,129 3,537 |
| Intel Celeron 4205U#ad | 2,114 3,480 |
| Intel Celeron N4020#ad | 1,991 3,426 |
| AMD A4-9125#ad | 1,560 2,393 |
| AMD A4-9120C#ad | 1,328 2,013 |
| AMD A4-9120e#ad | 1,309 1,913 |
On Linux: performance comparison in Geekbench 4 with Linux operating system.
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Athlon Silver 3050U#ad | 3,299 6,172 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500U#ad | 2,765 6,011 |
| AMD Ryzen 3 3200U#ad | 2,946 5,082 |
| Intel Pentium Gold 4417U#ad | 2,654 4,554 |
| Intel Celeron N4120#ad | 1,918 3,913 |
| AMD A4-9125#ad | 1,430 1,513 |
On Android: performance comparison in Geekbench 4 with Android operating system.
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4120#ad | 1,700 4,988 |
| Intel Pentium Gold 6405U#ad | 2,807 4,799 |
| Intel Celeron 3867U#ad | 2,364 4,063 |
| Intel Celeron 5205U#ad | 2,333 3,937 |
| Intel Celeron N4020#ad | 2,192 3,768 |
| AMD A4-9125#ad | 1,973 2,976 |
| AMD A4-9120C#ad | 1,451 2,170 |
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows: performance comparison in Geekbench 5 with Windows operating system.
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y#ad | 390 927 |
| Intel Celeron 5205U#ad | 439 900 |
| Intel Celeron N4020#ad | 468 851 |
| Intel Celeron 3867U#ad | 413 827 |
| Intel Celeron 4205U#ad | 423 814 |
| AMD A4-9125#ad | 308 518 |
| AMD A4-9120e#ad | 254 369 |
On Linux: performance comparison in Geekbench 5 with Linux operating system.
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Gold 4417U#ad | 565 1,048 |
| Intel Celeron 3867U#ad | 443 686 |
| Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y#ad | 430 637 |
| AMD A4-9120e#ad | 356 566 |
| Intel Celeron 4205U#ad | 369 498 |
| AMD A4-9125#ad | 361 473 |
On Android: performance comparison in Geekbench 5 with Android operating system.
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Android | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y#ad | 403 908 |
| MediaTek MT8183C#ad | 261 908 |
| Intel Celeron N4020#ad | 469 867 |
| Intel Celeron 5205U#ad | 451 826 |
| Intel Celeron 3867U#ad | 424 809 |
| AMD A4-9125#ad | 408 667 |
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
