Does Ubuntu run faster than Windows 10? [duplicate]
I’m going to reinstall an operating system in my computer. I had Windows 10 earlier, and now I’m thinking of using Ubuntu. I haven’t used Ubuntu before, so I have a few doubts.
Does Ubuntu run faster than Windows 10?
4 Answers 4
Is Ubuntu faster than Windows is a broad topic that depends on many topics including your computer’s hardware. Try running the Ubuntu live USB (which can also be used to install Ubuntu) from a live session without installing it to your computer’s hard drive. Then you can compare Ubuntu’s performance with Windows 10’s performance overall and on a per application basis.
Ubuntu runs faster than Windows on every computer that I have ever tested. LibreOffice (Ubuntu’s default office suite) runs much faster than Microsoft Office on every computer that I have ever tested. Many Windows games can also being installed on Ubuntu using Wine, and they usually run faster (and better) in Windows than they do in Wine.
There are several different flavors of Ubuntu ranging from vanilla Ubuntu to the faster lightweight flavors like Lubuntu and Xubuntu, which allows the user to select the Ubuntu flavor that is most compatible with the computer’s hardware.
Welcome to the Linux community!
First of all, I would like to clarify some things to you to help you make up you mind on which OS to pick. Nowadays, you’ll need to take into account the fact that there are several Linux distributions (distros) for different purposes.
I’d bet you want a desktop distro, so Ubuntu 18.04 LTS can work for you perfectly.
In terms of difficulty, you don’t need to worry, as desktop distributions are pretty user-friendly nowadays.
You will have to use the terminal for sure, so I would recommend you learn the basics about the Linux terminal.
In terms of speed, as Brandin mentioned, it depends on what are you going to use the OS for. If it is entirely for desktop purposes, like office, browser, . You won’t see any difference to Windows.
Hope this helps to you.
This is difficult to say and realy depends on your hardware and also on your way to use the computer.
If you have a SSD you may will not get a shorter booting time (Ubuntu vs. Win10) out of the box. Also the battery time (if using notebook) will decrease with Ubuntu / Linux compared to Win10 (for standard installation).
With Ubuntu / Linux the update cycles will be shorter and you do not waste hours of waiting to install updates from Microsoft, but for some hardware it can be difficult to get drivers or sometimes just strange screen flickering, etc. can happen. There you must be able to dig the internet / forum to find a possible solution.
I am using both Win10 and Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (and derivates like elementary OS) and happy with it. Daily usage normally Ubuntu, but if I need special software then I use Win10 (not every software is existing for Linux and Wine is a lot of time not perfect to run Windows-Software on Linux).
Overall I like and use Ubuntu a lot, espacially for my older laptops (just update HDD to SDD). Therefore it is realy great. I can use my old laptop from 2006 with 2 GB RAM and old CPU in a way, which would never be possible with Windows anymore.
«Will it be difficult to use and understand Linux? Will Linux be faster than Windows 10?»
Well the first answer that comes to mind here is : «depends on the operating system you choose»
Among the linux community we have a little moniker for them : «distro»
And you’ve instinctively posted on askubuntu, which is a testament to how much of a pole position ubuntu holds amongst the distributions.
The simple answer to why is «it’s easy, user friendly and is the hub for one of the biggest if not biggest collection of intercompatible libraries of all the linux distributions, which in layman’s terms means : despite these two first positive points they don’t act as a deterrent to more positive points, such as also having the full potential of linux»
So I’d personally recomend ubuntu, perhaps I’m biased but I really find there quite little that compares in terms of easing in a new user who might be entering a realm he feels foreign to. (Zorin comes to mind but they have less library intercompatibility and quite a few bugs, the UI is clearly better for someone who uses windows though, I recomend it also but not as strongly as I do ubuntu)
And there’s also little regrets to have about having chosen it first in case the investment becomes much much bigger : other linux distros won’t offer much more in the way of libraries.
If you ever do change to another, it’ll come down to wanting something incredibly specific.
Me personally, I’m a power user, a developer and a gamer.
Ubuntu is my daily driver for those three things and it has never let me down. I hope this speaks volumes.
I personally disagree with @EUS statement that you’ll need to learn even some terminal (even though I edited his post, since that’s his opinion, I left it in).
I believe nowadays a non-power user and beginer will never have recourse to the terminal (when using ubuntu!) .
as for speed there is little doubts that ubuntu is faster (just not for most games)
be sure to grab ubuntu 19.04 for the best experience.
Источник
Why Linux is faster than Windows
 | We expose some of the reasons why a user of Windows you will notice a diferencia important to your hardware performance when moving to Linux. |
It is not a question here of defending extreme positions, nor of irrational fanaticism. On the contrary, we expose some of the issues that every new Linux user notices soon after.
Table of Contents
Why Linux runs lighter from the start
Whoever didn’t have a virus on their Windows ever raise their hand. Nobody? Well, not even the most daring of hackers would dare to use Windows without the corresponding antivirus and antimalware installed. Actually, probably said hacker don’t use Windows, but that’s another story. The point is that all antivirus and antimalware scans any file that one opens or executes, which has a direct impact on system performance. It is enough to uninstall the antivirus to realize how much faster everything goes.
Linux, as everyone knows, practically does not suffer from viruses or malware, so an antivirus is not necessary.
In Windows, each application manages its update system separately. This implies that, in the best of cases, there will be different processes, one for each application, verifying if the programs in question need to be updated. In the worst case, there will be no automatic update available and the programs will have to be updated manually.
Although Linux distributions have different policies for updating their packages and this causes some to have certain updates beforehand, they all share the idea of a centralized library from which to manage the update system, and not just the packages that make the internals of the system but also of the desktop applications. This represents a significant saving of system resources.
An automatic Linux installation usually creates at least 3 partitions:
1. / (root) with all programs and settings. It would be C: with Program Files and Windows.
2. / home with personal files and settings. It would be the Windows Documents and Settings.
3. swap, an exclusive partition that works as virtual memory. This Windows does in a sad file normally located in the root of the system, which affects the defragmentation of the hard disk.
We are all root
Although today almost all versions of Windows allow the restriction of privileges for the installation of programs, the usual thing in home Windows installations is that the installation of programs does not require administrator privileges or, in other words, that the only user created is the administrator so the password is not required to perform potentially dangerous tasks for the system.
In Linux, on the other hand, all distributions force to differentiate the «common» user from the administrator and although the former may be granted temporary administrator privileges (through sudo), for this the corresponding password will always be required .
These greater limitations to perform potentially harmful tasks for the system end up implying greater security, but also greater system stability. Likewise, it puts a brake on the uncontrolled installation of new applications, with the respective saving of system resources that this implies.
In Windows some common functions and variables are stored in .DLL files (Dynamic Link Libraries). Its advantages include the possibility of reducing the size of executable files, of sharing their content between different applications, of facilitating their flexibility and extension and, finally, of facilitating the use of system resources.
However, the repetition of DLLs or the use of different versions by programs is very common. In this way, something that is conceptually beneficial ends up turning into hell. To such an extent that sometimes the duplicated DLLs are not just libraries but a complete framework, such as .NET. How many times did you discover that you had several versions of .NET installed at the same time because a program required one and another required one?
On Linux, on the other hand, this rarely happens. This is due, among other things, to the centralized system for installing libraries and programs that all distributions have and its elaborate system of dependencies that makes duplication of libraries or programs almost non-existent.
WYSIWYG (What you see is what you get)
Although this phrase is used to describe another aspect of Windows programs, it can be used to describe the system as a whole. When we purchase a Windows license, we obtain permission to use it under certain conditions. Not only that, but what they allow us to use is a closed package: there is no way to change the desktop environment if it is «heavy» for the limited hardware that we have. «What you see is what you have»; if you like it well and but also.
In Linux, on the other hand, you can change absolutely everything. This means that there are desktop environments, window managers, kernels and even applications adapted to each need. There are even distributions or «flavors» that bring all of this together in different ways and allow Linux to be used on limited hardware. This allows flexibility that Windows does not have. On the contrary, the new versions of Windows demand more and more hardware resources that force users to incur unnecessary expenses to renew it.
Why Windows gets even slower over time
An operating system is supposed to allow the user to interact with the hardware used, in our case, a computer. This interaction is carried out through drivers and programs. It is logical, then, that a good operating system allows you to install and uninstall programs without affecting the performance of the operating system, right? Well, that is NOT what happens in Windows.
Precisely, in Windows, anyone knows that at the beginning everything goes more or less fast but after a while the machine begins to walk increasingly slower. This is not by chance and, above all, IT IS NOT THE EXCLUSIVE FAULT OF THE USER because, as we said before, even if you have installed all the crap that you can think of, there are also «systemic» reasons for the decrease in system performance. For example…
Hard drive defragmentation
Possibly the biggest reason for the performance drop has to do with hard drive defragmentation. It is one of the problems that Windows has always had, and more specifically, the file system it uses: previously FAT and FAT32, today NTFS and with the arrival of Windows 8, ReFS.
Over time, and the creation of new information, new files, etc. These end up scattered on the disk, making it take longer and longer for the hard disk hardware to access them and consequently slowing down the system. Needless to say, the most affected files are usually those of Windows itself, which is constantly accessing and overwriting them.
On Linux, by contrast, you can choose from a plethora of file types, although EXT4 is generally used today.
The EXT4 file system also causes fragmentation just like NTFS, FAT32, or other file systems. However, the EXT4 block allocation algorithm works more efficiently and therefore fragmentation in Linux will always be infinitely less . seriously.
The Windows Registry
The Windows registry is a hierarchical database that stores configuration settings and options in Windows.
The kernel, device drivers, services, SAM, user interface make use of the registry and, to make matters worse, also third-party applications, which many times write data as they please in this database, fragmenting it and filling it with useless information that in some cases even runs into it. This obviously has an impact on performance.
On Linux, there is no comparable Registry. In general, program settings are stored in configuration files. This «decentralized» strategy not only does not saturate a single Registry but also greatly facilitates the removal of these settings when uninstalling programs.
Background services and applications
Software installation often buries new code at system startup without our consent or «hidden» from the user.
In addition, many of these programs remain in memory, either as a service or as background processes. From viruses to program or system update agents.
In Linux, although there are also applications that run in the background or at system startup, these are much fewer and they are also easier to distinguish, deactivate, block and / or uninstall.
In Windows there is an infinity of hidden software, especially extensions for browsers but also other types of applications linked to the monitoring or control of users, whether this is done by a company with a more justified appearance (Microsoft controlling that Windows is not «pirate» for example) or other types of software related to malware, viruses, etc. and that tend to abound in the Windows work environment.
Fortunately, free software predominates in Linux, which implies, among many other things, the non-existence of hidden software.
Why Linux is slower than Windows
Just as we argue that Linux is ahead of Windows in almost all aspects that affect not only the security and stability of the system but also its performance, we must be equally clear when admitting that there are some situations in which Windows has the upper hand.
Specifically, the proprietary video drivers are not up to the standard of Windows. Bad for the makers of those cards. Also, free drivers have even lower performance, but in that case there is nothing more to praise for the developers who make the drivers «blindly» through reverse engineering. It is truly a miracle that we have free drivers.
Still, in this regard, Windows still has the upper hand. Maybe it’s the only one I can think of right now. However, it is worth clarifying that this is an advantage that Microsoft has been able to take due to its monopoly position and due to its agreements with hardware manufacturers.
Also, in recent times there have been great advances in video drivers for Linux, driven by the impressive growth of Android (which is based on the Linux kernel) and the news of the launch of Steam for Linux, which prompted several companies to announce the development of video games for that platform.
The content of the article adheres to our principles of editorial ethics. To report an error click here!.
Full path to article: From Linux » FileLet’s UseLinux » Why Linux is faster than Windows
Источник
